Full Circle Lithium occupies a niche in the North American lithium value chain focused on battery-material reintegration, fire-suppression chemistry for lithium-ion incidents, and the operation of a newly acquired processing facility in Georgia. Since its 2022 incorporation, the company has combined technology for extinguishing lithium-ion battery fires with hydrometallurgical and recycling processing to capture value from end-of-life batteries and production scrap. Funding activity in 2024–2025 and a combination of private placements and post-IPO rounds have supported plant acquisition and pilot operations. The profile below compiles the company’s corporate facts, operating footprint, financing history, product set, and comparative positioning relative to global miners and midstream processors such as Albemarle, Sociedad Química y Minera (SQM), Ganfeng Lithium and regional recyclers like American Battery Technology Company.
Full Circle Lithium (FCLIF) Company Profile & Key Data — corporate snapshot and identification
This section provides a structured, tabular company profile suitable for rapid comparison with peers. The table compiles corporate identifiers, core focus, management, and public-information fields. It is drawn from corporate filings, press releases and industry databases currently available online. Where figures are not publicly disclosed, fields are flagged as Not disclosed to preserve factual accuracy.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Full Circle Lithium Corp. |
| Ticker(s) & Exchange(s) | FCLIF (OTC) |
| Country | United States (operations); Canada incorporation links in filings |
| Headquarters | Nahunta, Georgia, USA |
| Founded | 2022 |
| CEO | Carlos Vicens |
| Founders | Carlos Vicens; Tom Currin; Bill Bourcier |
| Employees | Small / early-stage — Not disclosed |
| Sector | Manufacturing / Battery Materials Processing |
| Sub-Sector | Battery material reintegration; lithium processing; battery fire suppression agents |
| Market Cap (USD) | Not disclosed — OTC listing; see investor pages |
| Revenue (USD) | Not publicly disclosed |
| Net Income (USD) | Not publicly disclosed |
| Lithium Production (tonnes LCE/year) | Not disclosed — company focuses on recycling and processing capacity rather than salaried mine production |
| Main Mines / Projects | Processing facility (Georgia); acquisitions to build closed-loop recycling |
| Project Locations | Georgia, United States (processing facility) |
| Proven & Probable Reserves | Not applicable (recycling/processing operator; no primary mining reserves reported) |
| Processing Facilities | Acquired lithium carbonate processing facility in Georgia; fully permitted status reported |
| Exploration Stage (If junior) | Not applicable — industrial processor and recycler |
| Key Partnerships / Clients | Strategic relationships not publicly detailed; media events cite demonstrations and industry interest |
| Stock Index Membership | OTC listing — not a member of major indices like S&P500 / ASX200 |
| ESG / Sustainability Initiatives | Closed-loop battery material reintegration; emphasis on carbon-neutral recycling pathways |
| Website | https://fullcirclelithium.com/home/ and About page |
Quick reference links and profiles on major financial databases are available for investor research:
- StockAnalysis company page
- Yahoo Finance profile
- MarketScreener company overview
- Tracxn dossier
- Crunchbase profile
Key insight: Full Circle Lithium is positioned as an industrial processor and recycler with an adjacent fire-suppression technology rather than a primary lithium miner, placing it within the midstream/technology niche of the battery supply chain.
Operations, assets and processing footprint — plant capabilities, technology and feedstock sources
The operational profile centers on recovery and reintegration of battery-grade materials from end-of-life batteries and production scrap. The company has publicly communicated the acquisition of a lithium processing facility in Georgia and emphasizes closed-loop processes that recover high-purity lithium carbonate and other battery metals. Operational detail is oriented toward hydrometallurgical flowsheets, solvent extraction, precipitation of lithium carbonate, and parallel recovery of copper, nickel and graphite where feasible.
Processing strategy and technology stack
Full Circle Lithium’s processing approach integrates a set of unit operations common to secondary battery-material recovery. The plant design described in corporate materials aims to capture value across multiple material streams rather than relying on a single commodity. Stated priorities include improving yield, lowering energy intensity, and minimizing secondary waste streams.
- Hydrometallurgical leaching for extraction of lithium and other soluble species from black mass.
- Solvent extraction and ion-exchange to purify lithium fractions to battery-grade specifications.
- Precipitation and carbonate conversion to produce lithium carbonate salts suitable for supply into cathode precursor and battery-grade supply chains.
- Materials reintegration — strategic pathways to return recovered nickel, cobalt, copper and graphite into manufacturing streams.
Each technology choice aims to reduce reliance on primary spodumene or brine producers. In practice, this shifts the company’s operational risk profile away from mining permits and toward feedstock sourcing and process optimisation. The scale-up schedule typically moves from pilot-stage campaigns to steady-state throughput; the company has not publicly disclosed full steady-state capacity as of the latest filings.
| Asset / Facility | Location | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia Processing Facility | Nahunta, Georgia | Lithium carbonate processing; battery-material reintegration; pilot and commercial stages |
| Laboratory & Pilot Circuit | On-site (Georgia) | Process development, material qualification |
| FCL-X Demonstration Unit | Field demonstrations (US) | Fire suppression testing for lithium-ion battery incidents |
Feedstock sources, logistics and contract considerations
Feedstock procurement for a recycler/processer differs markedly from mine-to-market logistics. Key feed sources include retired electric-vehicle battery packs, manufacturing scrap, and off-spec battery materials. Securing a consistent, cost-effective supply of black mass is a primary operational challenge for any recycler aiming at stable output. The company’s communications suggest active efforts to establish supply channels with local OEMs, dismantlers and logistics partners, but specific contracts and offtake are not publicly disclosed.
- Supply variability — volumes and chemistry of black mass can vary widely across sources, impacting yields and downstream product quality.
- Logistics costs — transportation of hazardous battery materials requires specialized handling and increases unit processing cost.
- Regulatory compliance — permitting for both recycling operations and hazardous-material handling is a material operational constraint.
Operational examples from the sector show that a recycler’s pathway to commercial reliability typically requires a three-step delivery: verified feed contracts, validated product quality (battery-grade chemical specifications) and commitment from buyers. Full Circle Lithium has published product and technology outlines and conducted demonstrations that aim to build buyer confidence. Independent observers often compare such operators to larger miners like Albemarle and integrated supply-chain players like Ganfeng Lithium, but Full Circle’s asset-light, technology-first model separates it functionally from large-scale spodumene and brine producers.
Key insight: The company’s operational focus on processing and recycling places emphasis on feedstock contracts and process yields; the Georgia facility is the core asset to scale commercial output.
Financial profile, funding history and market positioning — capital events, investor signals and data sources
Full Circle Lithium’s capital history to date has been characterized by early-stage post-IPO financing rounds and a private placement that funded the Georgia facility acquisition and pilot-scale operations. Public data points indicate discrete funding events in mid-2024, mid-2025 and a Canadian dollar private placement closing reported in September 2025. These events provide insight into the company’s capital intensity and timelines for scaling production.
Documented funding rounds and recent capital events
Available summaries from market databases indicate the following discrete events. Where reporting differs between sources, the table flags the originating disclosure.
| Date | Amount | Round Type | Notes / Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2024 | $1.15M | Post IPO | Early post-IPO financing; corporate disclosures summarized by Tracxn and PitchBook |
| Aug 15, 2025 | $3.26M | Post IPO | Reported in industry databases as a follow-on raise |
| Sep 5, 2025 | C$4.5M (private placement) | Private placement | Press release: GlobeNewsWire |
- Liquidity and market access: Trading on OTC markets limits index inclusion but allows access to North American retail and institutional investors seeking exposure to battery-material processors.
- Use of proceeds: Company statements indicate funds were allocated to facility acquisition, pilot operations and working capital.
- Valuation transparency: Post-raise valuations for small public companies vary across vendor data; check profiles on PitchBook and Bloomberg for differing metrics.
Investor research should leverage multiple sources. Profiles and financial summaries appear on aggregator sites including StockAnalysis, Yahoo Finance, MarketScreener and Tracxn. These sources help triangulate corporate disclosures, press announcements and third-party valuations.
Financial priorities for a processing and recycling operator typically cover near-term working capital, capital expenditure to reach steady-state throughput, and product qualification costs to secure long-term buyers. This company’s funding cadence through 2024–2025 underscores a capital-light early approach with targeted resource allocation to site commissioning and technology demonstrations rather than large-scale mine development.
Company Comparator — Full Circle Lithium & Peers
Quick interactive comparison. Click column headers to sort. Select up to 3 companies to compare side-by-side. Use the "Wiki summary" to fetch a short description (free public API).
| Company | Focus | Stage | Headquarters | Actions |
|---|
David Miller is a financial writer and analyst who has spent more than ten years studying how natural resources shape the global economy. His work often gravitates toward lithium and other battery metals, not just because of their financial weight, but because of their role in the world’s energy transition and the shift toward cleaner technologies.
Having followed the rise of electric vehicles and renewable energy from both an investment and environmental perspective, David believes that telling the story of each company matters. Behind every market cap or production figure, there are people, communities, and long-term projects that define how the lithium supply chain evolves.
In this directory, his goal is to provide profiles that are accurate, comparable, and accessible, but also written with an awareness of the bigger picture: how each company contributes to the future of energy, mobility, and sustainability.