The following profile compiles verified public-data snapshots and sector-context focused on Livent, an integrated lithium producer and battery-chemistry supplier active in the electric-vehicle and energy-storage supply chain. Coverage emphasizes operational footprint, reserve and production metrics, corporate structure, recent strategic moves and technology assets relevant to battery manufacturers and institutional investors. Data is drawn from company filings, market databases and industry press; links to primary corporate and analyst pages are provided for direct verification. Readers will find a consolidated company table for quick comparison, plus analytical sections that examine project-level detail, financial and transactional history, sustainability practices and competitive positioning versus global peers such as Albemarle, SQM and Ganfeng Lithium. The profile is intended as a factual reference tailored for analysts, procurement teams and portfolio managers evaluating exposure to lithium supply and midstream processing risk.
Livent company profile and core data — structured company table for investor comparison
This section presents a comprehensive table-first view of Livent’s public-facing corporate data points, aligned to standard lithium company fields to facilitate side-by-side comparison with other producers. The table aggregates formal identifiers, corporate leadership, operational metrics and market listings. The values shown combine the latest available public disclosures with verified analyst estimates where explicitly noted.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Livent Corporation |
| Ticker(s) & Exchange(s) | NYSE: LTHM (historical) — post-merger listings updated with combined entity details (see filings) |
| Country | United States |
| Headquarters | 1818 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA |
| Founded | 2018 (as stand-alone spin-out; legacy operations pre-date formal listing) |
| CEO | Company filings list executive leadership; see official pages |
| Employees | Several thousand (global operations and corporate staff) |
| Sector | Mining / Processing / Batteries |
| Sub-Sector | Lithium extraction, refining, battery materials |
| Market Cap (USD) | Public-market valuation varied with commodity cycle; refer to Bloomberg profile — Bloomberg |
| Revenue (USD) | Reported in annual filings; historical FY figures available via Craft and D&B — Craft, D&B |
| Net Income (USD) | Company reports and analyst models provide net income; review SEC-equivalent disclosures and financial databases |
| Lithium Production (tonnes LCE/year) | Operational production from salar and brine/upstream refining volumes vary annually; project-level output listed in section 2 |
| Main Mines / Projects | Active salar operations and processing plants in South America and North America; see project list and locations |
| Project Locations | Argentina, United States, and supply-chain partners in Australasia and Asia |
| Proven & Probable Reserves | Reserves reported in technical statements and updated post-merger; consult Tracxn and PitchBook for reserve estimates — Tracxn, PitchBook |
| Processing Facilities | Regional converters and purification plants supporting battery supply; feedstock to cathode producers |
| Exploration Stage (If junior) | Not applicable — integrated producer with upstream and midstream operations |
| Key Partnerships / Clients | Supply agreements and technology partnerships across EV OEMs and battery manufacturers; industry partners include major cell makers and materials groups |
| Stock Index Membership | Formerly listed on major exchanges; post-transaction listings vary — consult Bloomberg and CB Insights — CB Insights |
| ESG / Sustainability Initiatives | Programs focused on water management, low-carbon processing and community engagement as disclosed in sustainability reports |
| Website | Livent on Battery-Tech — primary corporate site and filings accessible through listed business directories — ZoomInfo, Datanyze |
- Key online sources: Tracxn, Bloomberg, Wikipedia.
- Complementary data: PitchBook, CB Insights.
- Regional legal and market notices: consult sector portals such as Lithium-Stocks legal notice.
Readers seeking transaction history should cross-reference corporate press releases and industry coverage; for example, listing movements and M&A activity are summarized below. This table forms the canonical quick-look reference for portfolio comparators and procurement due diligence. Final insight: table-first presentation allows immediate cross-company comparison in supply-chain modelling.
Livent operations, projects and production metrics — lithium extraction and processing details
This section details Livent’s on-the-ground operations and project-level characteristics that drive annual production and long-term reserve conversion. Emphasis is on feedstock type (brine, hard-rock), process pathways, and midstream refining capacity that connect raw lithium to battery-grade chemicals. The content aggregates public technical disclosures together with analyst-tracked project notes.
Operational footprint and processing chain
Livent operates integrated assets that span extraction through to battery-grade conversion. Typical workflows involve resource delineation, extraction (salar brine pumping or hard-rock mining), concentration or spodumene conversion and chemical refinement to produce lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide and specialty-grade lithium compounds. These refined outputs are critical inputs for cathode manufacturers used by EV OEMs and stationary-storage integrators.
- Feedstock types deployed: brine-based salar operations and associated evaporation techniques; regional conversion facilities for higher-purity products.
- Processing stages: extraction → concentration → purification → conversion to lithium hydroxide/carbonate.
- End markets: automotive batteries, consumer electronics, specialty polymers.
Examples illustrate operational variety. For a salar project, the extraction timeline includes layered evaporation ponds, chemical precipitation stages and a downstream purification circuit. For regional conversion, electrolytic or chemical conversion reactors produce battery-grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate suitable for NMC and NCA cathodes. These process distinctions matter when modelling carbon intensity, water consumption, and capital intensity.
Project locations, reserves and production figures
Publicly reported reserves and production outputs are subject to periodic revision. For practical modelling, Livent’s projects have been reported across Argentina and North America, with strategic partnerships that extend raw-material logistics to Asia-Pacific processing hubs. Reserve classification uses proven and probable categories in technical reports; for precise volumes, consult the company’s technical appendix and third-party databases such as Tracxn and PitchBook.
- Argentina (salar operations): historically significant for brine-derived carbonate; water management and saline ecology are key operational constraints.
- North America (processing): conversion plants close to chemical customers to reduce logistics cost and emissions footprint.
- Partnerships: toll-processing agreements and offtake contracts to stabilize market exposure.
Production metrics should be modelled with scenario bands. A conservative base case uses current run-rate production adjusted for announced expansion projects and likely ramp durations. An upside assumes successful optimization and additional capital projects; downside models incorporate commodity cycles and regulatory constraints. The practical insight: project-level granularity is essential for supply-risk assessments and contract negotiations.
| Metric | Implication |
|---|---|
| Feedstock mix | Impacts capital intensity, unit cash costs and carbon profile; brines generally lower cash cost but higher water management risk |
| Processing location | Proximity to cathode and cell manufacturers reduces logistics costs and can be a differentiator in long-term offtake negotiations |
| Reserve classification | Proven & probable influence lending terms and project financing options |
- For operational verification consult Livent pages on industry portals: Battery-Tech.
- Third-party company profiles and patent lists provide insight into product lines: see the patent summary and filings for battery chemistry innovations.
Case study: an Argentine salar expansion required staged pond-area expansion, permitting and additional evaporation seasons; such projects typically show multi-year capex schedules but low ongoing operating costs once ramped. Analysts should consider both calendar and hydrological cycles when projecting output. Final insight: operational diversification and upstream-to-midstream control reduce exposure to spot-price volatility.
Financial structure, transactions and market positioning — valuation, revenue drivers and M&A activity
This section examines Livent’s financial metrics, revenue composition, and notable corporate transactions that shaped its market position. It highlights the role of lithium market cycles on revenue streams and shows how strategic mergers and capital investments have altered scale and cost structures.
Revenue drivers and cost structure
Revenue is driven primarily by sales of lithium compounds to battery and specialty-chemical customers. Price realization depends on product specification (carbonate vs hydroxide) and contractual mix (spot sales vs long-term offtake). Cost drivers include energy, reagents used in conversion, labor and freight. Sensitivity analyses typically model commodity price moves and changes in average realized price per tonne of LCE (lithium carbonate equivalent).
- Primary revenue streams: industrial-grade and battery-grade lithium sales.
- Cost levers: feedstock source, process yield, energy mix and logistics.
- Margin dynamics: contracted volumes smooth revenue; spot exposure increases volatility.
Financial databases such as CB Insights, Bloomberg and corporate annual reports provide historical revenue and margin figures. Reported revenue near the last public cycles showed strong correlation with lithium price movements; post-merger accounting changes should be reconciled across filings.
Mergers, notable transactions and market impact
Livent’s strategic transactions have included combinations aimed at scale and geographic diversification. Industry media highlighted a significant merger-of-equals with Allkem valued around $10.6 billion in reported coverage, which reshaped the competitive landscape. Such consolidation reduces the number of independent upstream sellers and can alter bargaining power with OEMs and cathode makers.
- Merger-of-equals dynamics: expanded reserves, combined processing networks and cost-synergies.
- Financing implications: larger balance sheet and diversified cash flow reduce financing costs for project expansions.
- Market signals: consolidation influences supplier selection by large auto manufacturers seeking supply security.
Comparable public companies include Albemarle, SQM, FMC Corporation and Ganfeng Lithium. For junior and regional players, reference firms include Piedmont Lithium, Lithium Americas, Standard Lithium, Orocobre, Sigma Lithium and Mineral Resources Limited. Analysts should consult sector comparators when developing relative valuation models; sector portals such as Tracxn and company research on CB Insights provide benchmark datasets.
| Financial Topic | Analytical Note |
|---|---|
| Capital allocation | Priority often given to brownfield expansions and downstream processing to capture margin uplift. |
| Debt & equity mix | Post-transaction leverage should be analysed against commodity-price scenarios and capex commitments. |
| Shareholder dynamics | Strategic investors in the sector (e.g., Arcadium Lithium) can influence governance and future M&A. |
- Reference transaction coverage: M&A reports and legal advisories illustrated in industry press — see mentions in analyst collections.
- Public-data verification: company filings, Bloomberg corporate profile and D&B business directories.
Practical modelling tip: build base, upside and stress scenarios for revenue, applying different contract mixes and realized prices per LCE tonne. Key insight: transaction-driven scale reshapes cost curves and can materially change long-term margin assumptions.
Technology, patents, ESG and partnerships — innovation and sustainability in lithium supply
Technology and sustainability commitments are core differentiators for lithium companies as OEMs prioritize low-carbon and ethically sourced materials. This section reviews Livent’s patent activity, R&D orientation, environmental programs and strategic partnerships that support technology transfer to battery manufacturers.
Patents, product development and R&D focus
Livent’s patent portfolio includes filings related to lithium battery components and printable lithium capacities. Public patent registries list a series of filings; one notable grant in early 2025 concerned battery architectures that leverage printable lithium techniques for novel capacitor and battery hybrid applications. Such intellectual property can support differentiated product offerings to specialized battery manufacturers.
- Patent topics: capacitors, lithium-ion battery architectures, printable lithium.
- R&D emphasis: improving yield, lowering impurity levels and enabling higher-nickel cathode compatibility.
- Commercialization: patents support premium pricing for specialty grades used in advanced cell chemistries.
Analytical observers should map patent grants to commercial product releases. For instance, a granted patent on printable lithium could enable partnerships with cell-design firms seeking thin-film or next-generation cell formats. Databases like Craft and CB Insights provide searchable patent and product-fit matrices.
ESG initiatives and community engagement
Sustainability programs focus on water stewardship, reduced greenhouse gas intensity in processing and community development near project sites. Livent and peers publish sustainability reports describing targets for water recycling and reductions in scope 1 and scope 2 emissions. These disclosures matter for offtake partners and institutional investors using ESG screens.
- Water and local ecology: specific measures for brine operations include reduced surface footprint and progressive reclamation.
- Carbon mitigation: electrification of thermal processes and renewable energy procurement for processing plants.
- Social license: community investment programs and workforce development in operating regions.
Partnerships augment technical capabilities and market reach. Strategic collaborations with major battery and chemical firms secure long-term demand and technology exchange. The sector shows active partner networks: for example, mentions of Arcadium Lithium appear in transaction commentary and investor lists. Observers tracking counterparty risk should review supply agreements for take-or-pay clauses and pricing formulae.
| ESG Area | Example Initiative |
|---|---|
| Water management | Evaporation optimization and brine recycling to lower freshwater withdrawals |
| Emissions | On-site renewables and process electrification to reduce scope 1/2 intensity |
| Community | Local hiring targets and infrastructure investments near project sites |
- Patent listing reference: public filings and patent-grant notices; a summarized patent count cited 14 filings with several grants in early 2025.
- Partnerships and investor mentions: see industry press and investor databases for named partners such as Arcadium Lithium and others.
Final insight: technology and ESG execution are decisive factors for long-term offtake premiums and access to capital.
| Company | Headquarters | Primary feedstock | 2024 approx LCE ktpa | Notable strengths |
|---|
David Miller is a financial writer and analyst who has spent more than ten years studying how natural resources shape the global economy. His work often gravitates toward lithium and other battery metals, not just because of their financial weight, but because of their role in the world’s energy transition and the shift toward cleaner technologies.
Having followed the rise of electric vehicles and renewable energy from both an investment and environmental perspective, David believes that telling the story of each company matters. Behind every market cap or production figure, there are people, communities, and long-term projects that define how the lithium supply chain evolves.
In this directory, his goal is to provide profiles that are accurate, comparable, and accessible, but also written with an awareness of the bigger picture: how each company contributes to the future of energy, mobility, and sustainability.